Bollywood Women Centric Movies- Are those diverse and inclusive enough as intended?
Bollywood Women-centric Movies- is it a Paradox?
Being a woman, we are always motivated
to watch, promote and idealize women centric movies, and ‘’woman telling woman’s
story’’ makes it more special. We absolutely adored when names legends like
Nargis, Smita Patil, Sabaza Azmi, Deepti Naval, Meenakshi Sheshadri, or Dimple
Kapadia, delivered many women-centric progressive movies, biographies and
elevated the genre in cinemas. Not denying any of the fact that more films need
to be made on those women who have been inspiring generations to cross the
demographic barrier, preconceived notions on patriarchy and sexism; my question
is more towards whether these films are women centric actually or cast-centric?
What I mean is- while women story enthuse us to break the biases, do they make
justice while choosing the right woman for the craft?
Let’s throw some statistics from
Bollywood: here is the list of top 25 highest paid female actors in Bollywood sorted
in descending order with respect to their earnings per film [Source:medium.com.].
I am mapping them against overall movies and the number of women centric movies
they have been casted in. The finding is interesting.
|
Name |
Overall movies in leading role
|
No of women centric film |
Names of the movies |
|
Kangana Ranaut |
30+ |
8 |
Manikarnika, Panga, Queen, Tanu
weds Manu (2), Simran, Judgemental hai Keya? Woh Lamhe, |
|
Deepika Padukone |
25+ |
2 |
Chhapaak, Piku, |
|
Shraddha Kapoor |
15+ |
1 |
Stree |
|
Alia Bhat |
12+ |
3 |
Raazi, Dear Zindegi, Highway |
|
Priyanka Chopra |
40+ |
3 |
Fashion,Mary Kom, 7 Khun Maaf |
|
Kareena Kapoor |
47+ |
2 |
Heroine, Chameli, |
|
Katrina Kaif |
32+ |
0 |
|
|
Sonam Kapoor |
17+ |
3 |
Neerja, Aisha,Dolly ki Doli |
|
Vidya Balan |
20+ |
8+ |
Dirty Picture, Kahaani (2),
Shakuntala Devi, Tumhari Sullu, Begum Jaan, No one killed Jessica, Bobby
Jasoos |
|
Anushka Sharma |
19+ |
|
NH10, Pari, Phillauri |
|
Parineeti Chopra |
11+ |
1 |
Meri Payaari Bindu |
|
Sonakshi Sinha |
22+ |
3 |
Akira, Khandaani Shafakhana, Noor |
|
Aishwarya Rai |
33+ |
3 |
Umraao Jaan, Provoked, Sarbjit |
|
Jacqueline Fernandez |
22+ |
1 |
Mrs. Serial Killer |
|
Kajol |
38+ |
1 |
Helicopter Eela |
|
Kriti Shanon |
9+ |
0 |
|
|
Tapsee Pannu |
13+ |
3+ |
Thappad, Pink, Naam Shabana |
|
Kiara Advani |
8+ |
1 |
Guilty |
|
Bhumi Pednekar |
8+ |
2 |
Toilet, Shand ki Ankh |
|
Yami Gautam |
9+ |
0 |
|
|
Ileana Dcruz |
12+ |
0 |
|
|
Tabu |
33+ |
2 |
Chandni Bar, Astitva, |
|
Rani Mukherjee |
30+ |
3+ |
Mardani (2),Hichki, Aiyya |
|
Radhika Apte |
15+ |
1 |
Phobia, |
|
Others- Sara Ali Khan, Janhvi Kapoor, Ananya
Pande, Disha Patani etc |
4+ |
0 |
|
The
women centric movies are chosen on the basis of the lead female actors’ extent of
screen presence and the role in those movies. The reason behind taking the pain
to list down the names of the actresses -active in 2020 with a pay range of
1crore to 30crore, is –showing the importance to qualify the sample from a
large population and build on the hypothesis. The result is super skewed and one
can easily figure the two ‘Pareto’ names who are responsible for almost 75-80%
contribution in all the women centric movies of recent times. They are Kangana
Ranaut and Vidya Balan.
They obviously created a niche
space with their acting talent to carry out an entire film by themselves. They
were hardworking, coming from a non-film background, they always had the fire
to prove themselves to any possible extent. Even their initial choice of the
movies and certain decisions like refusal to act opposite to the 3 Khans or any
movie with high degree of testosterone, and talking openly to the media about
those -worked in their favour.
But are they all? Or there is
something else as well? Why is it somehow taken for granted that Kangana and
Vidya are the only fit choices for women centric roles in this decade? Isn’t it
a prejudice in itself and inclining to favouritism? Why can’t the film makers evaluate
who else is deserving and resembling far better with the actual character
before offering them the protagonist part?
There is no scarcity of talent in
the industry, neither any dearth of female actors -the above list is the
evidence. And the varieties offer by rest - range from adventurist to war hero,
from prostitute to activist, or from independent woman to circumstantial victim-
which are highly appreciated not only by many renowned film critiques, but also
in national award platforms. But why are they never auditioned when there is a
new woman-centric movie in the make? Why can’t Kareena Kapoor be a Shakuntala
Devi or Anushka Sharma play a Manikarnika? Are there selective perceptions in
play?
If this superficial
predisposition continues, the viewers will pretty soon get tired of the same
old persona offered by the two women, who, being currently content and
confident in their comfort zones so much, don’t intent to risk to break the rubrics
and hard-earned fandom.
Food for thought & disclaimer:
The women centric roles no longer endorse
a bias-free society, rather it promotes a monopoly to reign on those
opportunities without competition. No criticism is intended on the acting
talent of the two female actors in this article.



A very well researched post
ReplyDeleteMa'am, I'm amazed by the sheer amount of research, and the strong evidences you have built to prove your hypothesis, and your strong voice is indeed an icing on the cake. Kudos! :)
ReplyDeletePS: I'm not a movie buff, I rarely watch movies, but this was by far the best movie-related blog post I have come across :)
thanks for your comments. really appreciate it.
Delete