Bollywood Women Centric Movies- Are those diverse and inclusive enough as intended?

Bollywood Women-centric Movies- is it a Paradox?


Being a woman, we are always motivated to watch, promote and idealize women centric movies, and ‘’woman telling woman’s story’’ makes it more special. We absolutely adored when names legends like Nargis, Smita Patil, Sabaza Azmi, Deepti Naval, Meenakshi Sheshadri, or Dimple Kapadia, delivered many women-centric progressive movies, biographies and elevated the genre in cinemas. Not denying any of the fact that more films need to be made on those women who have been inspiring generations to cross the demographic barrier, preconceived notions on patriarchy and sexism; my question is more towards whether these films are women centric actually or cast-centric? What I mean is- while women story enthuse us to break the biases, do they make justice while choosing the right woman for the craft?

Let’s throw some statistics from Bollywood: here is the list of top 25 highest paid female actors in Bollywood sorted in descending order with respect to their earnings per film [Source:medium.com.]. I am mapping them against overall movies and the number of women centric movies they have been casted in. The finding is interesting.

Name

Overall movies in leading role

No of women centric film

Names of the movies

Kangana Ranaut

30+

8

Manikarnika, Panga, Queen, Tanu weds Manu (2), Simran, Judgemental hai Keya? Woh Lamhe,

Deepika Padukone

25+

2

Chhapaak, Piku,

Shraddha Kapoor

15+

1

Stree

Alia Bhat

12+

3

Raazi, Dear Zindegi, Highway

Priyanka Chopra

40+

3

Fashion,Mary Kom, 7 Khun Maaf

Kareena Kapoor

47+

2

Heroine, Chameli,

Katrina Kaif

32+

0

 

Sonam Kapoor

17+

3

Neerja, Aisha,Dolly ki Doli

Vidya Balan

20+

8+

Dirty Picture, Kahaani (2), Shakuntala Devi, Tumhari Sullu, Begum Jaan, No one killed Jessica, Bobby Jasoos

Anushka Sharma

19+

 

NH10, Pari, Phillauri

Parineeti Chopra

11+

1

Meri Payaari Bindu

Sonakshi Sinha

22+

3

Akira, Khandaani Shafakhana, Noor

Aishwarya Rai

33+

3

Umraao Jaan, Provoked, Sarbjit

Jacqueline Fernandez

22+

1

Mrs. Serial Killer

Kajol

38+

1

Helicopter Eela

Kriti Shanon

9+

0

 

Tapsee Pannu

13+

3+

Thappad, Pink, Naam Shabana

Kiara Advani

8+

1

Guilty

Bhumi Pednekar

8+

2

Toilet, Shand ki Ankh

Yami Gautam

9+

0

 

Ileana Dcruz

12+

0

 

Tabu

33+

2

Chandni Bar, Astitva,

Rani Mukherjee

30+

3+

Mardani (2),Hichki, Aiyya

Radhika Apte

15+

1

Phobia,

Others- Sara Ali Khan, Janhvi Kapoor, Ananya Pande, Disha Patani etc

4+

0

 

 

The women centric movies are chosen on the basis of the lead female actors’ extent of screen presence and the role in those movies. The reason behind taking the pain to list down the names of the actresses -active in 2020 with a pay range of 1crore to 30crore, is –showing the importance to qualify the sample from a large population and build on the hypothesis. The result is super skewed and one can easily figure the two ‘Pareto’ names who are responsible for almost 75-80% contribution in all the women centric movies of recent times. They are Kangana Ranaut and Vidya Balan.

They obviously created a niche space with their acting talent to carry out an entire film by themselves. They were hardworking, coming from a non-film background, they always had the fire to prove themselves to any possible extent. Even their initial choice of the movies and certain decisions like refusal to act opposite to the 3 Khans or any movie with high degree of testosterone, and talking openly to the media about those -worked in their favour.

But are they all? Or there is something else as well? Why is it somehow taken for granted that Kangana and Vidya are the only fit choices for women centric roles in this decade? Isn’t it a prejudice in itself and inclining to favouritism? Why can’t the film makers evaluate who else is deserving and resembling far better with the actual character before offering them the protagonist part?

There is no scarcity of talent in the industry, neither any dearth of female actors -the above list is the evidence. And the varieties offer by rest - range from adventurist to war hero, from prostitute to activist, or from independent woman to circumstantial victim- which are highly appreciated not only by many renowned film critiques, but also in national award platforms. But why are they never auditioned when there is a new woman-centric movie in the make? Why can’t Kareena Kapoor be a Shakuntala Devi or Anushka Sharma play a Manikarnika? Are there selective perceptions in play?

If this superficial predisposition continues, the viewers will pretty soon get tired of the same old persona offered by the two women, who, being currently content and confident in their comfort zones so much, don’t intent to risk to break the rubrics and hard-earned fandom.

Food for thought & disclaimer:  The women centric roles no longer endorse a bias-free society, rather it promotes a monopoly to reign on those opportunities without competition. No criticism is intended on the acting talent of the two female actors in this article.


Comments

  1. Ma'am, I'm amazed by the sheer amount of research, and the strong evidences you have built to prove your hypothesis, and your strong voice is indeed an icing on the cake. Kudos! :)
    PS: I'm not a movie buff, I rarely watch movies, but this was by far the best movie-related blog post I have come across :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts